A debate on language and tool support for design patterns

by: Craig Chambers, Bill Harrison, John Vlissides

(2000), pp. 277-289.

View FullText article

ACM, DOI

Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

Find related articles from these CiteULike users

zemeigo, ddahlem

Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

2000, debate, design, engineering, pattern, software

Abstract

Design patterns have earned a place in the developer's arsenal of tools and techniques for software development. They have proved so useful, in fact, that some have called for their promotion to programming language features. In turn this has rekindled the age-old debate over the mechanism that belong in programming languages versus those that are better served by tools. The debate comes full circle when one contemplates code generation and methodological tool support for patterns. The authors compare and contrast programming languages, tools, and patterns to assess their relative merits and to clarify their roles in the development process.

@inproceedings{citeulike:312012, abstract = {Design patterns have earned a place in the developer's arsenal of tools and techniques for software development. They have proved so useful, in fact, that some have called for their promotion to programming language features. In turn this has rekindled the age-old debate over the mechanism that belong in programming languages versus those that are better served by tools. The debate comes full circle when one contemplates code generation and methodological tool support for patterns. The authors compare and contrast programming languages, tools, and patterns to assess their relative merits and to clarify their roles in the development process.}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, author = {Chambers, Craig and Harrison, Bill and Vlissides, John }, booktitle = {POPL '00: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages}, citeulike-article-id = {312012}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/325694.325731}, isbn = {1581131259}, keywords = {pattern}, pages = {277--289}, posted-at = {2005-09-06 14:43:00}, priority = {2}, publisher = {ACM Press}, title = {A debate on language and tool support for design patterns}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/325694.325731}, year = {2000} }

RIS record

TY - CONF ID - citeulike:312012 L3 - citeulike-article-id:312012 TI - A debate on language and tool support for design patterns T2 - POPL '00: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages SP - 277 EP - 289 AD - New York, NY, USA PB - ACM Press SN - 1581131259 N2 - Design patterns have earned a place in the developer's arsenal of tools and techniques for software development. They have proved so useful, in fact, that some have called for their promotion to programming language features. In turn this has rekindled the age-old debate over the mechanism that belong in programming languages versus those that are better served by tools. The debate comes full circle when one contemplates code generation and methodological tool support for patterns. The authors compare and contrast programming languages, tools, and patterns to assess their relative merits and to clarify their roles in the development process. KW - pattern AU - Chambers, Craig AU - Harrison, Bill AU - Vlissides, John PY - 2000/// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/325694.325731 ER -

RIS BibTeX