The human sense of smell: are we better than we think?

@article{citeulike:423160, abstract = {[Human olfaction, over view, review, gene studies, behavioral studies, nasal cavity, retronasal smell, brain, language] One of the oldest beliefs about human perception is that we have a poor sense of smell. Not only is this a general belief among the public, but it appears to have a scientific basis. Recent genetic studies show a decline in the number of functional olfactory receptor genes through primate evolution to humans. Human evolution was characterized by the gradual ascendance of vision and reduction of smell, evidenced in the anthropological record by the progressive diminution of the snout as the eyes moved to the middle of the face to subserve depth vision. Concurrently, the use of an arboreal habitat and the adoption of an erect posture moved the nose away from the ground, with its rich varieties of odors. However, some recent behavioral studies suggest that primates, including humans, have relatively good senses of smell. Resolution of this paradox may come from a larger perspective on the biology of smell. Here they begin by reassessing several overlooked factors: the structure of the nasal cavity, retronasal smell, olfactory brain areas, and language. In these arenas, humans may have advantages which outweigh their lower numbers of receptors. It appears that in the olfactory system, olfactory receptor genes do not map directly onto behavior; rather, behavior is the outcome of multiple factors. If human smell perception is better than we thought, it may have played a more important role in human evolution than is usually acknowledged.}, address = {Department of Neurobiology at the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. gordon.shepherd@yale.edu}, author = {Shepherd, G. M. }, citeulike-article-id = {423160}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020146}, issn = {1545-7885}, journal = {PLoS Biol}, keywords = {olfaction, review}, month = {May}, number = {5}, posted-at = {2005-12-06 03:08:14}, priority = {0}, title = {The human sense of smell: are we better than we think?}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020146}, volume = {2}, year = {2004} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:423160 L3 - citeulike-article-id:423160 TI - The human sense of smell: are we better than we think? JF - PLoS Biol VL - 2 IS - 5 AD - Department of Neurobiology at the Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. gordon.shepherd@yale.edu SN - 1545-7885 N2 - [Human olfaction, over view, review, gene studies, behavioral studies, nasal cavity, retronasal smell, brain, language] One of the oldest beliefs about human perception is that we have a poor sense of smell. Not only is this a general belief among the public, but it appears to have a scientific basis. Recent genetic studies show a decline in the number of functional olfactory receptor genes through primate evolution to humans. Human evolution was characterized by the gradual ascendance of vision and reduction of smell, evidenced in the anthropological record by the progressive diminution of the snout as the eyes moved to the middle of the face to subserve depth vision. Concurrently, the use of an arboreal habitat and the adoption of an erect posture moved the nose away from the ground, with its rich varieties of odors. However, some recent behavioral studies suggest that primates, including humans, have relatively good senses of smell. Resolution of this paradox may come from a larger perspective on the biology of smell. Here they begin by reassessing several overlooked factors: the structure of the nasal cavity, retronasal smell, olfactory brain areas, and language. In these arenas, humans may have advantages which outweigh their lower numbers of receptors. It appears that in the olfactory system, olfactory receptor genes do not map directly onto behavior; rather, behavior is the outcome of multiple factors. If human smell perception is better than we thought, it may have played a more important role in human evolution than is usually acknowledged. KW - olfaction KW - review AU - Shepherd, GM PY - 2004/05// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020146 ER -