The science of cycology: Failures to understand how everyday objects work

by: Rebecca Lawson

pp. 1667-1675.

View FullText article

IngentaConnect

Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

Find related articles from these CiteULike users

yEvb0

Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

learning, memory

Abstract

When their understanding of the basics of bicycle design was assessed objectively, people were found to make frequent and serious mistakes, such as believing that the chain went around the front wheel as well as the back wheel. Errors were reduced but not eliminated for bicycle experts, for men more than women, and for people who were shown a real bicycle as they were tested. The results demonstrate that most people's conceptual understanding of this familiar, everyday object is sketchy and shallow, even for information that is frequently encountered and easily perceived. This evidence of a minimal and even inaccurate causal understanding is inconsistent with that of strong versions of explanation-based (or theory-based) theories of categorization.

@article{citeulike:1417361, abstract = {When their understanding of the basics of bicycle design was assessed objectively, people were found to make frequent and serious mistakes, such as believing that the chain went around the front wheel as well as the back wheel. Errors were reduced but not eliminated for bicycle experts, for men more than women, and for people who were shown a real bicycle as they were tested. The results demonstrate that most people's conceptual understanding of this familiar, everyday object is sketchy and shallow, even for information that is frequently encountered and easily perceived. This evidence of a minimal and even inaccurate causal understanding is inconsistent with that of strong versions of explanation-based (or theory-based) theories of categorization.}, author = {Lawson, Rebecca }, citeulike-article-id = {1417361}, keywords = {learning, memory}, month = {December}, pages = {1667--1675}, posted-at = {2007-06-27 21:14:51}, priority = {3}, title = {The science of cycology: Failures to understand how everyday objects work}, url = {http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/psocpubs/mrc/2006/00000034/00000008/art00010} }

RIS record

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1417361 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1417361 TI - The science of cycology: Failures to understand how everyday objects work SP - 1667 EP - 1675 N2 - When their understanding of the basics of bicycle design was assessed objectively, people were found to make frequent and serious mistakes, such as believing that the chain went around the front wheel as well as the back wheel. Errors were reduced but not eliminated for bicycle experts, for men more than women, and for people who were shown a real bicycle as they were tested. The results demonstrate that most people's conceptual understanding of this familiar, everyday object is sketchy and shallow, even for information that is frequently encountered and easily perceived. This evidence of a minimal and even inaccurate causal understanding is inconsistent with that of strong versions of explanation-based (or theory-based) theories of categorization. KW - learning KW - memory AU - Lawson, Rebecca UR - http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/psocpubs/mrc/2006/00000034/00000008/art00010 ER -

RIS BibTeX