新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

The National Survey of Local Anaesthesia for Ocular Surgery. II. Safety profiles of local anaesthesia techniques.

by: T Eke, JR Thompson
Eye, Vol. 13 ( Pt 2) (April 1999), pp. 196-204.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the adverse events associated with local anaesthesia (LA) for intraocular surgery. METHODS: An observational study of practice of LA in the whole of the United Kingdom was conducted over 3 months in late 1996. Staff in all ophthalmology theatres in the National Health Service were invited to report every LA given for the purpose of intraocular surgery during the first week, and thereafter to report adverse events only. RESULTS: During the first week, the reported incidence of all adverse events within the orbit was 2.7%, and for 'systemic' adverse events it was 0.9%. Serious adverse events were reported in association with all LA techniques. In 3 months, 18 events were described as 'life-threatening' by respondents, and further patients were reported to have had epileptic fits or were transferred directly from the operating theatre to an intensive care unit. The voluntary nature of the survey introduces some bias from under-reporting, making the incidence of these severe events difficult to assess. Reported incidence of severe 'systemic' adverse events was similar for all LA techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Serious adverse events were reported in association with with all LA techniques. This implies that we should be prepared for such events in all patients who have intraocular surgery.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.