Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.

@article{citeulike:1282035, abstract = {Eye movements were monitored as participants followed spoken instructions to manipulate one of four objects pictured on a computer screen. Target words occurred in utterance-medial (e.g., Put the cap next to the square) or utterance-final position (e.g., Now click on the cap). Displays consisted of the target picture (e.g., a cap), a monosyllabic competitor picture (e.g., a cat), a polysyllabic competitor picture (e.g., a captain) and a distractor (e.g., a beaker). The relative proportion of fixations to the two types of competitor pictures changed as a function of the position of the target word in the utterance, demonstrating that lexical competition is modulated by prosodically conditioned phonetic variation.}, address = {Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Meliora Hall, Box 270268, Rochester, NY 14627, USA; Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.}, author = {Salverda, Anne Pier P. and Dahan, Delphine and Tanenhaus, Michael K K. and Crosswhite, Katherine and Masharov, Mikhail and McDonough, Joyce }, citeulike-article-id = {1282035}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.008}, issn = {0010-0277}, journal = {Cognition}, month = {December}, posted-at = {2007-06-06 19:04:58}, priority = {0}, title = {Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.008}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1282035 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1282035 TI - Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition. JF - Cognition AD - Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Meliora Hall, Box 270268, Rochester, NY 14627, USA; Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. SN - 0010-0277 N2 - Eye movements were monitored as participants followed spoken instructions to manipulate one of four objects pictured on a computer screen. Target words occurred in utterance-medial (e.g., Put the cap next to the square) or utterance-final position (e.g., Now click on the cap). Displays consisted of the target picture (e.g., a cap), a monosyllabic competitor picture (e.g., a cat), a polysyllabic competitor picture (e.g., a captain) and a distractor (e.g., a beaker). The relative proportion of fixations to the two types of competitor pictures changed as a function of the position of the target word in the utterance, demonstrating that lexical competition is modulated by prosodically conditioned phonetic variation. AU - Salverda, Anne Pier AU - Dahan, Delphine AU - Tanenhaus, Michael K AU - Crosswhite, Katherine AU - Masharov, Mikhail AU - McDonough, Joyce PY - 2006/12/01/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.008 ER -