Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journal - The editors of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics explain their journal’s approach.

@article{citeulike:757162, abstract = {Recent high-profile cases of scientific fraud have fuelled the discussion of scientific quality control. A problem of similar, if not greater, importance is the large proportion of carelessly prepared scientific papers that dilute rather than enhance scientific knowledge. Both problems indicate shortcomings in the traditional peer-review system. Many scientists and publishers believe that peer review remains the best available approach for quality assurance, but requests for improvements are commonplace.}, author = {Koop, Thomas and P\"{o}schl, Ulrich }, citeulike-article-id = {757162}, journal = {Nature}, keywords = {open\_access, peer-review}, posted-at = {2006-07-13 15:32:46}, priority = {2}, title = {Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journal - The editors of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics explain their journal’s approach.}, url = {http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988.html}, volume = {0498}, year = {2006} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:757162 L3 - citeulike-article-id:757162 TI - Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journal - The editors of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics explain their journal’s approach. JF - Nature VL - 0498 N2 - Recent high-profile cases of scientific fraud have fuelled the discussion of scientific quality control. A problem of similar, if not greater, importance is the large proportion of carelessly prepared scientific papers that dilute rather than enhance scientific knowledge. Both problems indicate shortcomings in the traditional peer-review system. Many scientists and publishers believe that peer review remains the best available approach for quality assurance, but requests for improvements are commonplace. KW - open_access KW - peer-review AU - Koop, Thomas AU - Pöschl, Ulrich PY - 2006/// UR - http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988.html ER -