新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

kharke library [733 articles]

最近 kharke さんのライブラリ .
  • The NISO License Expression Working Group
    Serials Review, Vol. 34, No. 2. (June 2008), pp. 162-163.
    by Mark Needleman
    posted to standards eresource_management by kharke on 2008-07-23 15:09:29 as **
  • License Mapping for ERM Systems: Existing Practices and Initiatives for Support
    Serials Review, Vol. 34, No. 2. (June 2008), pp. 137-143.
    by Lisa B Ruth
    posted to standards eresource_management by kharke on 2008-07-23 15:08:21 as **
  • Interpreting meta-analysis in systematic reviews
    Evid Based Med, Vol. 13, No. 3. (1 June 2008), pp. 67-69.
    by Rafael Perera, Carl Heneghan
    posted to systematic_reviews statisticalanalysis meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-07-22 15:19:23 as **
  • Reasons or excuses for avoiding meta-analysis in forest plots
    BMJ, Vol. 336, No. 7658. (21 June 2008), pp. 1413-1415.
    by John P Ioannidis, Nikolaos A Patsopoulos, Hannah R Rothstein
    posted to systematic_reviews statisticalanalysis meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-07-21 22:11:39 as **
  • A new approach to outliers in meta-analysis
    Health Care Management Science, Vol. 11, No. 2. (30 June 2008), pp. 121-131.
    by Rose Baker, Dan Jackson
    posted to systematic_reviews statisticalanalysis meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-07-21 22:08:45 as **
  • Notes on Operations: Evaluating and Improving the Presentation of Serials Information in the Online Catalog.
    Library Resources & Technical Services, Vol. 52, No. 3. (July 2008), pp. 192-204.
    by Lori J Terrill
    posted to informationbehavior ils_opacs collection_management cataloging by kharke on 2008-07-14 22:05:40 as **
  • Simplified search strategies were effective in identifying clinical trials of pharmaceuticals and physical modalities
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 58, No. 9. (September 2005), pp. 874.e1-874.e11.
    by Doreen Day, Andrea Furlan, Emma Irvin, Claire Bombardier
    posted to systematic_reviews researchmethods by kharke on 2008-07-11 20:04:22 as **
  • Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research
    JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 294, No. 2. (13 July 2005), pp. 218-228.
    by John P Ioannidis
    posted to systematic_reviews quality publishing periodicals-as-topic-standards by kharke on 2008-07-11 20:01:43 as **
  • How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis
    Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 147, No. 4. (21 August 2007), pp. 224-233.
    by Kaveh, Margaret, Mohammed, Jun, Steve, David
    posted to systematic_reviews quality by kharke on 2008-07-11 19:56:05 as **
  • Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 6 (13 June 2006), 27.
    by Beverley J Shea, Maarten Boers, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Candyce D Hamel, Lex M Bouter
    posted to systematic_reviews quality by kharke on 2008-07-11 19:37:13 as **
  • The ratio of means method as an alternative to mean differences for analyzing continuous outcome variables in meta-analysis: a simulation study.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 8 (21 May 2008), 32.
    by Jan O Friedrich, Neill KJ Adhikari, Joseph Beyene
    posted to statisticalanalysis meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-07-11 19:35:38 as ** along with 1 person cucherat
  • Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study
    BMJ, Vol. 332, No. 7535. (28 January 2006), pp. 202-209.
    by Giuseppe G Biondi-Zoccai, Marzia Lotrionte, Antonio Abbate, Luca Testa, Enrico Remigi, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Valgimigli, Enrico Romagnoli, Filippo Crea, Pierfrancesco Agostoni
    posted to standards research-standards publishing-standards meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-07-11 19:25:22 as **
  • Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 49, No. 2. (February 1996), pp. 235-243.
    by Alejandro R Jadad, Henry J Mcquay
    posted to systematic_reviews statisticalanalysis researchmethods meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-07-11 18:50:55 as **
  • A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews
    CMAJ, Vol. 156, No. 10. (15 May 1997), pp. 1411-1416.
    by AR Jadad, DJ Cook, GP Browman
    posted to systematic_reviews researchmethods by kharke on 2008-07-11 18:49:26 as **
  • Relationship between Quality and Editorial Leadership of Biomedical Research Journals: A Comparative Study of Italian and UK Journals
    PLoS ONE, Vol. 3, No. 7. (2 July 2008), e2512.
    by Valerie Matarese
    posted to quality publishing impactfactor bibliometrics by kharke on 2008-07-07 15:06:05 as ** along with 1 group Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse
  • On indexing in the Web of Science and predicting journal impact factor
    Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, Vol. 9, No. 7. (1 July 2008), pp. 582-590.
    by Xiu-Fang Wu, Qiang Fu, Ronald Rousseau
    posted to impactfactor bibliometrics by kharke on 2008-07-07 14:56:21 as ** along with 1 person leonardo
  • The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 8. (August 2008), pp. 770-775.
    by Jin Wen, Yu Ren, Li Wang, Youping Li, Ya Liu, Min Zhou, Ping Liu, Lu Ye, Yi Li, Wei Tian
    posted to statisticalanalysis research-standards quality meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-06-30 18:46:01 as **
  • Results assessment and impact creation in collaborative research--An example from the ECOLEAD project
    Technovation, Vol. 27, No. 1-2. ( 2007), pp. 65-77.
    by Luis M Camarinha-Matos, Hamideh Afsarmanesh
    posted to publishing peer-review citation_analysis by kharke on 2008-06-29 21:13:11 as **
  • On the heuristic value of scientific publications and their design; A citation analysis of some clinical trials
    Scientometrics, Vol. 30, No. 1. (26 May 1994), pp. 175-186.
    by Bluma Peritz
    posted to systematic_reviews scientometrics citation_analysis bibliometrics by kharke on 2008-06-29 21:03:56 as **
  • The usefulness of monographic proceedings.
    Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 76, No. 1. (January 1988), pp. 14-21.
    by ME Funk, CA Reid
    posted to scientometrics publishing lis collection_management citation_analysis bibliometrics by kharke on 2008-06-29 20:46:06 as **
  • Innovative Library Liaison Assessment Activities
    Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, No. 46. (Spring 2006)
    by Mylene Ouimette
    posted to scientometrics citation_analysis bibliometrics by kharke on 2008-06-29 20:24:57 as **
  • Estimating Time to Conduct a Meta-analysis From Number of Citations Retrieved, August 18, 1999, 282 (7): 634
    JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 282, No. 7. (18 August 1999), pp. 634-635.
    by E Allen, I Olkin
    posted to standards researchmethods quality meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-06-23 18:20:39 as **
  • Recent developments in meta-analysis
    Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 9999, No. 9999. (2007), n/a.
    by Alexander J Sutton, Julian PT Higgins
    posted to statisticalanalysis researchmethods meta-analysis epidemiology by kharke on 2008-06-22 18:25:35 as ** along with 2 people jyuh bcaffo
  • Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related
    Int. J. Epidemiol., Vol. 29, No. 3. (1 June 2000), pp. 387-390.
    by Douglas L Weed
    posted to statisticalanalysis researchmethods meta-analysis epidemiology by kharke on 2008-06-22 18:23:06 as **
  • Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.
    Int J Epidemiol, Vol. 36, No. 3. (June 2007), pp. 666-676.
    by S Sanderson, ID Tatt, JP Higgins
    posted to systematic_reviews research-standards quality publishing-standards periodicals-as-topic-standards meta-analysis epidemiology by kharke on 2008-06-22 17:23:35 as ** along with 3 people and 1 group lilith misc8g jyuh 801
  • Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 61, No. 5. (May 2008), pp. 440-448.
    by Su Golder, Yoon Loke, Heather M Mcintosh
    posted to systematic_reviews researchmethods quality lis by kharke on 2008-06-22 02:47:58 as ** along with 1 group Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse
  • How do we measure the use of scientific journals? A note on research methodologies
    Scientometrics, Vol. 76, No. 1. (16 July 2008), pp. 125-133.
    by Golnessa Moghaddam, Mostafa Moballeghi
    posted to lis informationbehavior eresource_management e-metrics citation_analysis bibliometrics by kharke on 2008-06-20 15:11:10 as **
  • Expanding medical library support in response to the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy.
    Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, Vol. 95, No. 4. (October 2007), pp. 450-453.
    by MC Barnett, MW Keener
    posted to research-standards publishing lis by kharke on 2008-06-18 18:31:55 as ** along with 1 group Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse
  • Adjusting a relative-risk estimate for study imperfections
    J Epidemiol Community Health, Vol. 62, No. 7. (1 July 2008), pp. 655-663.
    by G Maldonado
    posted to statisticalanalysis researchmethods meta-analysis by kharke on 2008-06-18 14:55:30 as ** along with 1 person jyuh
  • Systematic Reviews and Librarians
    Library Trends, Vol. 55, No. 1. (2006), pp. 202-215.
    by Ann Mckibbon
    posted to systematic_reviews librarianship by kharke on 2008-06-15 23:07:01 as **
  • A simplified search strategy for identifying randomised controlled trials for systematic reviews of health care interventions: a comparison with more exhaustive strategies
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 5, No. 23. (July 2005)
    by Pamela Royle, Norman Waugh
    posted to systematic_reviews researchmethods evidence-based by kharke on 2008-06-14 04:15:12 as **
  • The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement
    Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 26, No. 4. (August 2005), pp. 480-487.
    by Edward J Mills, Ping Wu, Joel Gagnier, PJ Devereaux
    posted to researchmethods quality publishing-standards by kharke on 2008-06-14 04:07:39 as **
  • Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
    American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 89, No. 9. (1999), pp. 1322-1327.
    by RE Glasgow, TM Vogt, SM Boles
    posted to researchmethods quality publishing-standards publichealth by kharke on 2008-06-14 04:04:21 as **
  • CONSORT: An Important Step toward Evidence-Based Health Care
    Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 126, No. 1. (1997), pp. 81-83.
    by Freemantle
    posted to researchmethods quality publishing-standards evidence-based by kharke on 2008-06-14 03:59:52 as **
  • The reporting of methodological factors in randomized controlled trials and the association with a journal policy to promote adherence to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist
    Controlled Clinical Trials, Vol. 23, No. 4. (August 2002), pp. 380-388.
    by PJ Devereaux, Braden J Manns, William A Ghali, Hude Quan, Gordon H Guyatt
    posted to researchmethods publishing-standards by kharke on 2008-06-14 03:55:21 as ** along with 1 person and 1 group hpiwowar Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse
  • Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials
    BMJ, Vol. 328, No. 7437. (21 February 2004), 432.
    by Dean Fergusson, Kathleen C Glass, Duff Waring, Stan Shapiro
    posted to researchmethods quality by kharke on 2008-06-14 03:51:23 as **
  • CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.
    BMJ, Vol. 328, No. 7441. (20 March 2004), pp. 702-708.
    by MK Campbell, DR Elbourne, DG Altman,
    posted to researchmethods publishing-standards by kharke on 2008-06-14 03:41:33 as ** along with 1 person abelmagalhaes
  • A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 58, No. 12. (December 2005), pp. 1233-1240.
    by Isabelle Boutron, David Moher, Peter Tugwell, Bruno Giraudeau, Serge Poiraudeau, Remy Nizard, Philippe Ravaud
    posted to publishing-standards by kharke on 2008-06-14 03:33:57 as **
  • Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors.
    BMJ, Vol. 330, No. 7499. (7 May 2005), pp. 1056-1057.
    by DG Altman
    posted to quality publishing-standards by kharke on 2008-06-14 03:28:28 as ** along with 2 people and 1 group hpiwowar abelmagalhaes Academic Writing, Literacies and Discourse
  • notes Analysis of the study design and manuscript deficiencies in research articles submitted to Emergency Medicine.[see comment]
    Emerg Med (Fremantle), Vol. 13, No. 4., 444-50.
    by DM Taylor, AF Brown
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:22 as **
  • notes Publish or perish: easier said than done.[comment]
    Emerg Med (Fremantle), Vol. 13, No. 4., 407-8.
    by J Tintinalli
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:22 as **
  • notes Site visits for the review of grant applications to the National Institutes of Health: Views of an applicant and a scientist administrator
    Fed Proc, Vol. 34, No. 2. (1975), 131-6.
    by DH Merritt, GN Eaves
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:22 as **
  • Criteria for guidelines on the role of the individual and the community in the research, development, and use of biologicals
    Bull World Health Organ, Vol. 55 Suppl 2 (1977), 173-7.
    by Anonymous
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:22 as **
  • notes Concerning the quality control of a biomedical journal
    J Nucl Med Allied Sci, Vol. 21, No. 3. (1977), 125-7.
    by L Donato, G Mariani
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:22 as **
  • notes Conduct of surveys
    Br Med J, Vol. 2, No. 6146. (1978), 1201-2.
    by G Rose, DJ Barker
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:21 as **
  • On the incidence of errors in large epidemiology studies with comments on evaluation, interpretation, and future surveys
    J Perinat Med, Vol. 9, No. 2. (1981), 79-86.
    by EP Issel, H Eggers, G Hofmann, U Kruger, G Scheinpflug
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:21 as **
  • notes Double standards, scientific methods, and epidemiologic research
    N Engl J Med, Vol. 307, No. 26. (1982), 1611-7.
    by AR Feinstein, RI Horwitz
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:21 as **
  • Evaluation of the vascular clinical trial program of metrizamide and iohexol
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh), Vol. 25, No. 1. (1984), 59-64.
    by E Andrew
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:21 as **
  • notes Ensuring data quality in medical research through an integrated data management system
    Stat Med, Vol. 3, No. 2. (1984), 101-11.
    by YN Marinez, CA Mcmahan, GM Barnwell, HS Wigodsky
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:21 as **
  • notes The importance of quality control in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial
    Control Clin Trials, Vol. 7, No. 3 Suppl. (1986), 3pp prior to 1S.
    by GR Cooper
    posted to quality publishing file-import-08-06-13 by kharke on 2008-06-13 22:43:21 as **
    • 注: このページを引用する時は次のURLでどうぞ: http://www.citeulike.org/user/kharke

    Result page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next RIS BibTeX RSS
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.