MEASUREMENT AND THE DYNAMICS OF PARTY IDENTIFICATION

@article{citeulike:2614381, abstract = {Recent work has questioned the conclusions of the revisionist model of party identification. One central issue concerns the measurement of party identification. According to the critics, the research showing that partisanship is responsive to other political evaluations is in error because of peculiarities of measurement, I test this assertion by considering the effects that changes in measurement have on estimates of the dynamics of party identification. The results strongly support the original revisionist conclusions. The findings of responsiveness of party identification to evaluations of par\~{}" issue positions are quite robust in the face of alternative measures of party identification. Our}, author = {Franklin, Charles H. }, citeulike-article-id = {2614381}, journal = {Political Behavior}, keywords = {politics}, number = {3}, posted-at = {2008-03-31 01:27:59}, priority = {2}, title = {MEASUREMENT AND THE DYNAMICS OF PARTY IDENTIFICATION}, volume = {14}, year = {1992} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:2614381 L3 - citeulike-article-id:2614381 TI - MEASUREMENT AND THE DYNAMICS OF PARTY IDENTIFICATION JF - Political Behavior VL - 14 IS - 3 N2 - Recent work has questioned the conclusions of the revisionist model of party identification. One central issue concerns the measurement of party identification. According to the critics, the research showing that partisanship is responsive to other political evaluations is in error because of peculiarities of measurement, I test this assertion by considering the effects that changes in measurement have on estimates of the dynamics of party identification. The results strongly support the original revisionist conclusions. The findings of responsiveness of party identification to evaluations of par~" issue positions are quite robust in the face of alternative measures of party identification. Our KW - politics AU - Franklin, Charles PY - 1992/// ER -