新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

The squamous cell carcinoma tumor marker in mammary carcinoma: comparison of polyclonal versus monoclonal antibody-based assays.

by: T Wobbes, CM Thomas, MF Segers
Oncology, Vol. 47, No. 1. (1990), pp. 14-18.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

Pretreatment serum levels of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)-antigen as determined with a polyclonal and monoclonal antibody-based assay were determined in 136 patients with invasive mammary carcinoma, 8 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and 23 patients with benign breast diseases. For the polyclonal assay, the overall sensitivity was 44.8% at a cut-off level of 2.0 ng/ml and 25% for 2.5 ng/ml. For the monoclonal assay, the sensitivity was 11.0 and 25.0% at cut-off levels of 2.0 and 1.5 ng/ml, respectively. On the basis of analysis of specificity of the two assays for the benign control group, the cut-off level of the polyclonal assay has to be 2.5 ng/ml in the case of mammary carcinoma, of the monoclonal assay it has to be 2.0 ng/ml. For 175 serum samples of the whole group of patients (pre- and postoperative samples), the polyclonal RIA (x) and the monoclonal IRMA (y) were measured. The orthogonal regression analysis gave the equation: monoclonal IRMA = 1.03 polyclonal RIA - 1.15 ng/ml (Sy.x = 0.48; r = 0.7225). We also came to the conclusion that the SCC-antigen measured by either assay is different.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.