The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language.

@article{citeulike:607421, abstract = {Functional imaging methods show differences in the pattern of cerebral activation associated with the subject's native language (L1) compared with a second language (L2). In a recent PET investigation on bilingualism we showed that auditory processing of stories in L1 (Italian) engages the temporal lobes and temporoparietal cortex more extensively than L2 (English). However, in that study the Italian subjects learned L2 late and attained a fair, but not an excellent command of this language (low proficiency, late acquisition bilinguals). Thus, the different patterns of activation could be ascribed either to age of acquisition or to proficiency level. In the current study we use a similar paradigm to evaluate the effect of early and late acquisition of L2 in highly proficient bilinguals. We studied a group of Italian-English bilinguals who acquired L2 after the age of 10 years (high proficiency, late acquisition bilinguals) and a group of Spanish-Catalan bilinguals who acquired L2 before the age of 4 years (high proficiency, early acquisition bilinguals). The differing cortical responses we had observed when low proficiency volunteers listened to stories in L1 and L2 were not found in either of the high proficiency groups in this study. Several brain areas, similar to those observed for L1 in low proficiency bilinguals, were activated by L2. These findings suggest that, at least for pairs of L1 and L2 languages that are fairly close, attained proficiency is more important than age of acquisition as a determinant of the cortical representation of L2.}, address = {Istituto di Neuroscienze e Bioimmagini-CNR, Scientific Institute H. San Raffaele, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.}, author = {Perani, D. and Paulesu, E. and Galles, N. S. and Dupoux, E. and Dehaene, S. and Bettinardi, V. and Cappa, S. F. and Fazio, F. and Mehler, J. }, citeulike-article-id = {607421}, doi = {10.1093/brain/121.10.1841}, issn = {0006-8950}, journal = {Brain}, month = {October}, pages = {1841--1852}, posted-at = {2008-03-27 23:34:05}, priority = {2}, title = {The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.10.1841}, volume = {121 ( Pt 10)}, year = {1998} }

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:607421 L3 - citeulike-article-id:607421 TI - The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. JF - Brain VL - 121 ( Pt 10) SP - 1841 EP - 1852 AD - Istituto di Neuroscienze e Bioimmagini-CNR, Scientific Institute H. San Raffaele, University of Milan, Milano, Italy. SN - 0006-8950 N2 - Functional imaging methods show differences in the pattern of cerebral activation associated with the subject's native language (L1) compared with a second language (L2). In a recent PET investigation on bilingualism we showed that auditory processing of stories in L1 (Italian) engages the temporal lobes and temporoparietal cortex more extensively than L2 (English). However, in that study the Italian subjects learned L2 late and attained a fair, but not an excellent command of this language (low proficiency, late acquisition bilinguals). Thus, the different patterns of activation could be ascribed either to age of acquisition or to proficiency level. In the current study we use a similar paradigm to evaluate the effect of early and late acquisition of L2 in highly proficient bilinguals. We studied a group of Italian-English bilinguals who acquired L2 after the age of 10 years (high proficiency, late acquisition bilinguals) and a group of Spanish-Catalan bilinguals who acquired L2 before the age of 4 years (high proficiency, early acquisition bilinguals). The differing cortical responses we had observed when low proficiency volunteers listened to stories in L1 and L2 were not found in either of the high proficiency groups in this study. Several brain areas, similar to those observed for L1 in low proficiency bilinguals, were activated by L2. These findings suggest that, at least for pairs of L1 and L2 languages that are fairly close, attained proficiency is more important than age of acquisition as a determinant of the cortical representation of L2. AU - Perani, D AU - Paulesu, E AU - Galles, NS AU - Dupoux, E AU - Dehaene, S AU - Bettinardi, V AU - Cappa, SF AU - Fazio, F AU - Mehler, J PY - 1998/10// UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.10.1841 ER -