新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Lattice protein folding with two and four-body statistical potentials.

by: HH Gan, A Tropsha, T Schlick
Proteins, Vol. 43, No. 2. (1 May 2001), pp. 161-174.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

The cooperative folding of proteins implies a description by multibody potentials. Such multibody potentials can be generalized from common two-body statistical potentials through a relation to probability distributions of residue clusters via the Boltzmann condition. In this exploratory study, we compare a four-body statistical potential, defined by the Delaunay tessellation of protein structures, to the Miyazawa-Jernigan (MJ) potential for protein structure prediction, using a lattice chain growth algorithm. We use the four-body potential as a discriminatory function for conformational ensembles generated with the MJ potential and examine performance on a set of 22 proteins of 30-76 residues in length. We find that the four-body potential yields comparable results to the two-body MJ potential, namely, an average coordinate root-mean-square deviation (cRMSD) value of 8 A for the lowest energy configurations of all-alpha proteins, and somewhat poorer cRMSD values for other protein classes. For both two and four-body potentials, superpositions of some predicted and native structures show a rough overall agreement. Formulating the four-body potential using larger data sets and direct, but costly, generation of conformational ensembles with multibody potentials may offer further improvements. Proteins 2001;43:161-174.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.