Biophys. J., Vol. 48, No. 2. (1 August 1985), pp. 241-246.
Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 178, No. 1. (March 2007), pp. 135-140.
by
Kihara,
Ken,
Hirose,
Nobuyuki,
Mima,
Tatsuya,
Abe,
Mitsunari,
Fukuyama,
Hidenao,
Osaka,
Naoyuki
Brain Research Reviews, Vol. 53, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 250-259.
J Clin Neurophysiol, Vol. 24, No. 1. (February 2007), pp. 31-38.
J Cogn Neurosci, Vol. 19, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 266-274.
Brain Research Bulletin, Vol. 71, No. 5. (15 March 2007), pp. 523-528.
Brain Research Bulletin, Vol. 71, No. 5. (15 March 2007), pp. 493-500.
European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 25, No. 4. (February 2007), pp. 1240-1244.
Prog Brain Res, Vol. 154 (2006), pp. 33-70.
Vision Research, Vol. 47, No. 2. (January 2007), pp. 166-178.
Vision Research, Vol. 46, No. 23. (November 2006), pp. 4032-4047.
Psychological Science, Vol. 16, No. 8. (August 2005), pp. 644-651.
PNAS, Vol. 102, No. 51. (20 December 2005), pp. 18751-18756.
Vision Research, Vol. 47, No. 3. (February 2007), pp. 349-356.
Vision Research, Vol. 45, No. 9. (April 2005), pp. 1095-1098.
Journal of Vision, Vol. 6, No. 9. (September 2006), pp. 955-965.
Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 68, No. 5. (July 2006), pp. 800-814.
Vision Research, Vol. 46, No. 22. (October 2006), pp. 3823-3830.
Vision Research, Vol. 47, No. 4. (February 2007), pp. 474-478.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 19, No. 1. (Using *transcranial* *magnetic* *stimulation* (*TMS*), we have tested the time needed for the perceived onset of spontaneous motor intention to be fully determined. We found that *TMS* applied over the presupplementary motor area after the execution of a simple spontaneous action shifted the perceived onset of the motor intention backward in time, and shifted the perceived time of action execution forward in time. The size of the effect was similar regardless of whether *TMS* was applied immediately after the action or 200 msec after. The results of three control studies suggest that this effect is time-limited, specific to modality, and also specific to the anatomical site of stimulation. We conclude that the perceived onset of intention depends, at least in part, on neural activity that takes place after the execution of action. A model, which is based on the mechanism of cue integration under the presence of noise, is offered to explain the results. The implications for t! January 2007), pp. 81-90.
J Neurophysiol, Vol. 97, No. 1. (1 January 2007), pp. 348-359.
Spatial Vision, Vol. 19, No. 2-4. (2006), pp. 323-340.
Vision Research, Vol. 39, No. 16. (August 1999), pp. 2729-2737.
Vision Research, Vol. 45, No. 25-26. (November 2005), pp. 3277-3289.
Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 67, No. 7. (August 2005), pp. 1289-1303.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 4. (August 2006), pp. 369-389.
Vision Res, Vol. 46, No. 15. (July 2006), pp. 2403-2411.
Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 17, No. 2. (February 2007), pp. 457-465.
Psychol Med, Vol. 33, No. 1. (January 2003), pp. 33-40.
Movement Disorders, Vol. 18, No. 4. (2003), pp. 382-388.
Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 49, No. 5. (1 March 2001), pp. 460-463.
Neurosci Lett, Vol. 382, No. 3. (15 July 2005), pp. 312-316.
J. Cogn. Neurosci., Vol. 18, No. 12. (1 December 2006), pp. 2167-2176.
Nature, Vol. 429, No. 6989. (20 May 2004)
Neuron, Vol. 52, No. 4. (22 November 2006), pp. 731-742.
Biological Psychiatry, Vol. 45, No. 4. (15 February 1999), pp. 385-394.
Science, Vol. 292, No. 5516. (20 April 2001), pp. 510-512.
Perception, Vol. 35, No. 6. (2006), pp. 837-845.
Neuropsychologia, Vol. 44, No. 7. (2006), pp. 1222-1229.
Exp Brain Res (21 July 2006)
Current Biology, Vol. 16, No. 15. (8 August 2006), pp. 1479-1488.
Curr Biol, Vol. 14, No. 19. (5 October 2004)
J Physiol Paris, Vol. 97, No. 2-3. (y 2003), pp. 365-377.
J Neurophysiol, Vol. 71, No. 6. (1 June 1994), pp. 2517-2542.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, Vol. 101, No. 18. (4 May 2004), pp. 7147-7151.
Cereb. Cortex, Vol. 11, No. 7. (1 July 2001), pp. 648-665.
European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 21, No. 2. (January 2005), 536.
Biosystems, Vol. 79, No. 1-3. (r 2005), pp. 143-149.
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, Vol. 15, No. 4. (August 2005), pp. 459-464.
PLoS Biol, Vol. 3, No. 10. (October 2005)