新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

A feature principle for partial agreement

by: William Badecker
Lingua, Vol. 117, No. 9. (September 2007), pp. 1541-1565.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

An Optimality Theoretic account of partial agreement (agreement with just one of multiple conjuncts) presented here explains typologically interrelated properties of partial agreement. For example, in languages such as Moroccan and Lebanese Arabic, partial agreement is optional, incompatible with anaphor binding, and limited to non-collective predication; in languages such as Welsh and Standard Arabic, it is obligatory, compatible with anaphor binding and free of semantic constraint on predication. These correlated properties are explained through the interaction of constraints requiring agreement with an NP's concord features and a distinct set of constraints requiring agreement with index features. Partial agreement is possible only when the optimal type of agreement (index agreement in some languages, concord agreement in others) cannot be satisfied by the conjoined phrase as a whole. Conjoined NPs lack concord features, so a constraint requiring agreement with concord features will oblige agreement with a conjunct that bears concord features. Conjoined NPs may lack index features (if they encode an exclusively non-collective referent set), but this lack of index will also entail partial agreement. Which of the conjuncts a verb agrees with is determined by alignment constraints favoring the conjunct that is linearly closest to the agreement target.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.