Subcortical control of dopamine neurons: the good, the bad and the unexpected.

by: RD Stewart, EJ Dommett

Brain Res Bull, Vol. 71, No. 1-3. (11 December 2006), pp. 1-3.

View FullText article

DOI, Pubmed, Hubmed, ScienceDirect

Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

Find related articles from these CiteULike users

brian, oamg, sschafer, awooga, rcoreilly, Glimcher_Lab (group)

Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

dopamine, no-tag, novelty, pptg, reinforcement_learning, reward_prediction_error, rpe, substantia-nigra, superior-colliculus, vta

Abstract

The function of the phasic dopamine signal, seen in response to salient and rewarding stimuli, has been heavily debated. The reward prediction error hypothesis has been criticised for the suggestion that such a complex signal could be derived at short latencies, relying only on subcortical inputs. However, as more has been learnt about the nature of the subcortical inputs, we are led to challenge this criticism. Here we suggest that the subcortical inputs can indeed support complex calculations and that it would be unwise to underestimate their processing capabilities. Whilst our analysis cannot differentiate between the reward prediction error hypothesis and its opponents, it does suggest that the initial argument against a prediction error is incorrect.

@article{citeulike:1118592, abstract = {The function of the phasic dopamine signal, seen in response to salient and rewarding stimuli, has been heavily debated. The reward prediction error hypothesis has been criticised for the suggestion that such a complex signal could be derived at short latencies, relying only on subcortical inputs. However, as more has been learnt about the nature of the subcortical inputs, we are led to challenge this criticism. Here we suggest that the subcortical inputs can indeed support complex calculations and that it would be unwise to underestimate their processing capabilities. Whilst our analysis cannot differentiate between the reward prediction error hypothesis and its opponents, it does suggest that the initial argument against a prediction error is incorrect.}, author = {Stewart, R. D. and Dommett, E. J. }, citeulike-article-id = {1118592}, doi = {10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.08.010}, issn = {0361-9230}, journal = {Brain Res Bull}, keywords = {dopamine, pptg, substantia-nigra, superior-colliculus, vta}, month = {December}, number = {1-3}, pages = {1--3}, posted-at = {2007-03-28 15:35:09}, priority = {0}, title = {Subcortical control of dopamine neurons: the good, the bad and the unexpected.}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.08.010}, volume = {71}, year = {2006} }

RIS record

TY - JOUR ID - citeulike:1118592 L3 - citeulike-article-id:1118592 TI - Subcortical control of dopamine neurons: the good, the bad and the unexpected. JF - Brain Res Bull VL - 71 IS - 1-3 SP - 1 EP - 3 SN - 0361-9230 N2 - The function of the phasic dopamine signal, seen in response to salient and rewarding stimuli, has been heavily debated. The reward prediction error hypothesis has been criticised for the suggestion that such a complex signal could be derived at short latencies, relying only on subcortical inputs. However, as more has been learnt about the nature of the subcortical inputs, we are led to challenge this criticism. Here we suggest that the subcortical inputs can indeed support complex calculations and that it would be unwise to underestimate their processing capabilities. Whilst our analysis cannot differentiate between the reward prediction error hypothesis and its opponents, it does suggest that the initial argument against a prediction error is incorrect. KW - dopamine KW - pptg KW - substantia-nigra KW - superior-colliculus KW - vta AU - Stewart, RD AU - Dommett, EJ PY - 2006/12/11/ UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2006.08.010 ER -

RIS BibTeX