On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3Biological Psychology, Vol. 56, No. 3. (1 June 2001), pp. 207-218.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractDeviant stimuli give rise to a late positive ERP component with latencies from 250 to 400 ms. Target deviants elicit a P300 with maximum amplitude over parieto-central recording sites while the ‘P300’ elicited by deviant nontarget stimuli occurs somewhat earlier and shows a more frontally-oriented scalp distribution. Two varieties of frontal P300s have been described, elicited either by rare stimuli (target or nontarget) presented in a two-stimulus oddball task (P3a) or by infrequent, unrecognizable stimuli presented in the context of a three-stimulus oddball task (Novelty-P3). The Novelty-P3 has been observed in a number of subsequent studies; the P3a has not been extensively studied and both its significance and existence have been called into question. The present report describes a replication of two prototypical studies with ‘frontal’ P3s observed in each context. Application of factor analysis to the two sets of ERP waveforms does not support a distinction between these two components.
BibTeX record
RIS record