新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Age-related differences in novelty and target processing among cognitively high performing adults

by: Kirk R Daffner, Katherine K Ryan, Danielle M Williams, Andrew E Budson, Dorene M Rentz, Leonard F Scinto, Phillip J Holcomb
Neurobiology of Aging, Vol. In Press, Corrected Proof


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

Previous research on age-related changes in ERP components in response to novel and target stimuli has not carefully controlled for differences in level of cognitive status between age groups, which may have contributed to the common findings of increased P3 latency, decreased P3 amplitude, and altered P3 scalp distribution. Here, cognitively high-performing (top third based on published norms) old, middle-aged, and young adults matched for IQ, education, and gender participated in a novelty oddball paradigm. There were no age-associated differences in P3 latency. Older adults had a larger, more anteriorly distributed P3 amplitude to all stimulus types, even repetitive standards, suggesting they may rely on increased resources and effortful frontal activity to successfully process any kind of visual stimulus. However, after controlling for this non-specific age-related processing difference, the amplitude and scalp distribution of the P3 component to novel and target stimuli were comparable across age groups, indicating that for cognitively high functioning elders there may be no age-related differences specific to the processing of novel and target events as indexed by the P3 component.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.