P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, Vol. 78, No. 1. (January 1991), pp. 50-55.
|
Reviews
[Write a review of this article]
There are no reviews of this article
Find related articles from these CiteULike users
Find related articles with these CiteULike tags
AbstractEvent-related potentials (ERPs) to task-relevant target and task-irrelevant novel stimuli were recorded in a somatosensory discrimination task. Subjects pressed a button to mechanical taps of the fifth finger (targets, P = 0.12), randomly interposed in sequences of taps to the second finger (standards, P = 0.76). Two types of infrequent novel stimuli were delivered; one was a mechanical tap to the third or fourth finger (tactile novels, P = 0.06), another was an electric shock at the wrist (shock novels, P = 0.06). Correctly detected targets generated a parietal maximal P300 (P3b, latency 335 msec). Shock novels generated a central maximal P300 with a shorter peak latency (298 msec) than the P3b. Tactile novels generated a P300 with a scalp distribution comparable to the shock novels. Unlike the P3b, P300 amplitude to both the shock and tactile novel stimuli habituated by 20-30% across the first several stimulus presentations. These results indicate that, similar to the auditory and visual modality, task-irrelevant novel somatosensory stimuli generate a novelty P300 ERP. Differences in scalp distribution, latency and habituation characteristics suggest that the novelty P300 may have contributions from intracranial generators independent from target P300 sources.
BibTeX record
RIS record