新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli.

by: S Yamaguchi, RT Knight
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, Vol. 78, No. 1. (January 1991), pp. 50-55.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) to task-relevant target and task-irrelevant novel stimuli were recorded in a somatosensory discrimination task. Subjects pressed a button to mechanical taps of the fifth finger (targets, P = 0.12), randomly interposed in sequences of taps to the second finger (standards, P = 0.76). Two types of infrequent novel stimuli were delivered; one was a mechanical tap to the third or fourth finger (tactile novels, P = 0.06), another was an electric shock at the wrist (shock novels, P = 0.06). Correctly detected targets generated a parietal maximal P300 (P3b, latency 335 msec). Shock novels generated a central maximal P300 with a shorter peak latency (298 msec) than the P3b. Tactile novels generated a P300 with a scalp distribution comparable to the shock novels. Unlike the P3b, P300 amplitude to both the shock and tactile novel stimuli habituated by 20-30% across the first several stimulus presentations. These results indicate that, similar to the auditory and visual modality, task-irrelevant novel somatosensory stimuli generate a novelty P300 ERP. Differences in scalp distribution, latency and habituation characteristics suggest that the novelty P300 may have contributions from intracranial generators independent from target P300 sources.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.