新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 
CiteULike is a free online bibliography manager. Register and you can start organising your references online.
Recent | Unread | Search | Authors | Tags | Export

Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related fMRI with multiple trial types: Part II: design of experiments

by: Thomas T Liu
NeuroImage, Vol. 21, No. 1. (January 2004), pp. 401-413.


View FullText article


X Reviews [Write a review of this article]

There are no reviews of this article

X Find related articles from these CiteULike users

X Find related articles with these CiteULike tags

X Abstract

The performance of an experimental design for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can be characterized by its estimation efficiency, which is the ability to make an estimate of the hemodynamic response, its detection power, which is the ability to detect an activation, and its conditional entropy, which is a measure of the randomness of the design. In Liu and Frank [Neuroimage 21 (2004) 387-400], it is shown that there is a fundamental theoretical trade-off between estimation efficiency and detection power for experiments with multiple trial types and that there is an empirical relation between estimation efficiency and conditional entropy. This paper provides an intuitive interpretation of the theoretical results and examines the practical implications of these results for the optimal design of fMRI experiments with multiple trial types. The properties of block designs, permuted block designs, m-sequence designs, clustered m-sequence designs, and mixed designs are explored. It is shown that these designs nearly achieve the theoretically predicted performance and can be used in practice to obtain advantageous trade-offs among efficiency, power, and entropy.


X BibTeX record

X RIS record



RIS BibTeX
CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.