新規登録 | ログイン | FAQ      [?] 

タグ: preference_assessment [20 articles]

Recent papers classified by the tag preference_assessment.
  • Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature
    Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 26, No. 1. ( 2005), pp. 1-15.
    by Helen I Cannella, Mark F O'Reilly, Giulio E Lancioni
  • The effects of establishing operations on preferences for tangible items.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 38, No. 1. (2005), pp. 107-110.
    by DB McAdam, KP Klatt, M Koffarnus, A Dicesare, K Solberg, C Welch, S Murphy
  • The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 11, No. 1. (1978), pp. 153-162.
    by DE Mithaug, DA Hanawalt
  • A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 22, No. 2. (1989), pp. 171-179.
    by SA Mason, GG McGee, V Farmer-Dougan, TR Risley
  • A replication to increase happiness indices among some people with profound multiple disabilities
    Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 18, No. 1. ( 1997), pp. 79-89.
    by Martin T Ivancic, Gary T Barrett, Amy Simonow, Abbey Kimberly
  • Instrumental conditioning of choice behavior in male Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens)
    Behavioural Processes, Vol. 63, No. 3. (31 July 2003), pp. 171-175.
    by Baine B Craft, Ii Velkey, Allen Szalda-Petree
  • Teaching nonvocal communication skills to multihandicapped retarded adults.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 10, No. 4. (1977), pp. 591-603.
    by DH Reid, B Hurlbut
  • The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments
    Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 20, No. 1. (02 January 1999), pp. 63-72.
    by Thomas S Higbee, James E Carr, Cristin D Harrison
  • Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 28, No. 1. (1995), pp. 61-71.
    by RG Smith, BA Iwata, BA Shore
  • A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 25, No. 2. (1992), pp. 491-498.
    by W Fisher, CC Piazza, LG Bowman, LP Hagopian, JC Owens, I Slevin
  • The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 33, No. 1. (2000), pp. 85-88.
    by JM Gottschalk, ME Libby, RB Graff
  • A threshold model of choice behaviour
    Animal Behaviour, Vol. 17, No. Part 1. (February 1969), pp. 120-133.
    by Richard Dawkins
  • Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Behavior Modification, Vol. 28, No. 5. (September 2004), pp. 668-677.
    by LP Hagopian, ES Long, KS Rush
  • Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 32, No. 4. (1999), pp. 419-435.
    by GP Hanley, BA Iwata, JS Lindberg
  • Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 30, No. 3. (1997), pp. 451-458.
    by LG Bowman, CC Piazza, WW Fisher, LP Hagopian, JS Kogan
  • notes Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
    Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 34, No. 4. (2001), pp. 475-485.
    by LP Hagopian, KS Rush, AB Lewin, ES Long
  • Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.
    Am J Ment Retard, Vol. 110, No. 2. (March 2005), pp. 145-154.
    by C de Vries, CT Yu, G Sakko, KM Wirth, KL Walters, C Marion, GL Martin
  • notes A two-choice preference assessment with five cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci, Vol. 7, No. 3. (2004), pp. 163-169.
  • Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
    J Appl Behav Anal, Vol. 29, No. 1. (1996), pp. 1-9.
    by CC Piazza, WW Fisher, LP Hagopian, LG Bowman, L Toole
    posted to preference_assessment by danifazzio on 2005-04-16 04:07:36 as **
  • Empirically derived consequences: a data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior.
    Res Dev Disabil, Vol. 15, No. 2. (r 1994), pp. 133-149.
    by W Fisher, CC Piazza, LG Bowman, LP Hagopian, NA Langdon
    posted to preference_assessment by danifazzio on 2005-04-16 04:08:32 as **
  • 注: このページを引用する時は次のURLでどうぞ: http://www.citeulike.org/tag/preference_assessment

    RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.