<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:25:43 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: nelmor Beshel</title>
	<description>CiteULike: nelmor Beshel</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/nelmor/author/Beshel</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/nelmor/article/1772156"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/nelmor/article/1532469"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/nelmor/article/1772156">
    <title>An Olfacto-Hippocampal Network Is Dynamically Involved in Odor-Discrimination Learning</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/nelmor/article/1772156</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Neurophysiol, Vol. 98, No. 4. (1 October 2007), pp. 2196-2205.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Several studies have shown that memory consolidation relies partly on interactions between sensory and limbic areas. The functional loop formed by the olfactory system and the hippocampus represents an experimentally tractable model that can provide insight into this question. It had been shown previously that odor-learning associated beta band oscillations (1530 Hz) of the local field potential in the rat olfactory system are enhanced with criterion performance, but it was unknown if these involve networks beyond the olfactory system. We recorded local field potentials from the olfactory bulb (OB) and dorsal and ventral hippocampus during acquisition of odor discriminations in a go/no-go task. These regions showed increased beta oscillation power during odor sampling, accompanied by a coherence increase in this frequency band between the OB and both hippocampal subfields. This coherence between the OB and the hippocampus increased with the onset of the first rule transfer to a new odor set and remained high for all learning phases and subsequent odor sets. However, coherence between the two hippocampal fields reset to baseline levels with each new odor set and increased again with criterion performance. These data support hippocampal involvement in the network underlying odor-discrimination learning and also suggest that cooperation between the dorsal and ventral hippocampus varies with learning progress. Oscillatory activity in the beta range may thus provide a mechanism by which these areas are linked during memory consolidation, similar to proposed roles of beta oscillations in other systems with long-range connections. 10.1152/jn.00524.2007</description>
    <dc:title>An Olfacto-Hippocampal Network Is Dynamically Involved in Odor-Discrimination Learning</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Claire Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Beshel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Leslie Kay</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1152/jn.00524.2007</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J Neurophysiol, Vol. 98, No. 4. (1 October 2007), pp. 2196-2205.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-10-16T03:51:23-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Neurophysiol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>98</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>4</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>2196</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>2205</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>hippocampus</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lfp</prism:category>
    <prism:category>olfactory</prism:category>
    <prism:category>olfactory-bulb</prism:category>
    <prism:category>oscillations</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/nelmor/article/1532469">
    <title>Olfactory Bulb Gamma Oscillations Are Enhanced with Task Demands</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/nelmor/article/1532469</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J. Neurosci., Vol. 27, No. 31. (1 August 2007), pp. 8358-8365.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fast oscillations in neural assemblies have been proposed as a mechanism to facilitate stimulus representation in a variety of sensory systems across animal species. In the olfactory system, intervention studies suggest that oscillations in the gamma frequency range play a role in fine odor discrimination. However, there is still no direct evidence that such oscillations are intrinsically altered in intact systems to aid in stimulus disambiguation. Here we show that gamma oscillatory power in the rat olfactory bulb during a two-alternative choice task is modulated in the intact system according to task demands with dramatic increases in gamma power during discrimination of molecularly similar odorants in contrast to dissimilar odorants. This elevation in power evolves over the course of criterion performance, is specific to the gamma frequency band (6585 Hz), and is independent of changes in the theta or beta frequency band range. Furthermore, these high amplitude gamma oscillations are restricted to the olfactory bulb, such that concurrent piriform cortex recordings show no evidence of enhanced gamma power during these high-amplitude events. Our results display no modulation in the power of beta oscillations (1528 Hz) shown previously to increase with odor learning in a Go/No-go task, and we suggest that the oscillatory profile of the olfactory system may be influenced by both odor discrimination demands and task type. The results reported here indicate that enhancement of local gamma power may reflect a switch in the dynamics of the system to a strategy that optimizes stimulus resolution when input signals are ambiguous. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1199-07.2007</description>
    <dc:title>Olfactory Bulb Gamma Oscillations Are Enhanced with Task Demands</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jennifer Beshel</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Nancy Kopell</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Leslie Kay</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1199-07.2007</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J. Neurosci., Vol. 27, No. 31. (1 August 2007), pp. 8358-8365.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-08-03T06:54:13-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J. Neurosci.</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>31</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>8358</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>8365</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>bulb</prism:category>
    <prism:category>discrimination</prism:category>
    <prism:category>gamma</prism:category>
    <prism:category>olfactory</prism:category>
    <prism:category>oscillations</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

