<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:42:48 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: matthewhflamm detachment</title>
	<description>CiteULike: matthewhflamm detachment</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/tag/detachment</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2602843"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2599410"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2599360"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2602843">
    <title>Models for the Specific Adhesion of Cells to Cells</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2602843</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A theoretical framework is proposed for the analysis of adhesion between cells or of cells to surfaces when the adhesion is mediated by reversible bonds between specific molecules such as antigen and antibody, lectin and carbohydrate, or enzyme and substrate. From a knowledge of the reaction rates for reactants in solution and of their diffusion constants both in solution and on membranes, it is possible to estimate reaction rates for membrane-bound reactants. Two models are developed for predicting the rate of bond formation between cells and are compared with experiments. The force required to separate two cells is shown to be greater than the expected electrical forces between cells, and of the same order of magnitude as the forces required to pull gangliosides and perhaps some integral membrane proteins out of the cell membrane.</description>
    <dc:title>Models for the Specific Adhesion of Cells to Cells</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>George Bell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-03-27T17:56:32-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:category>adhesion</prism:category>
    <prism:category>detachment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>receptor</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2599410">
    <title>Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2599410</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Biotechnology &#38; Bioengineering, Vol. 72, No. 2. (2001), pp. 205-218.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A two-dimensional model for biofilm growth and detachment was used to evaluate the effect of detachment on biofilm structures. The detachment process is considered to be due to internal stress created by moving liquid past the biofilm. This model generated a variety of realistic biofilm-formation patterns. It was possible to model in a unified way two different biofilm detachment processes, erosion (small-particle loss), and sloughing (large-biomass-particle removal). The distribution of the fraction from total biomass detached as a function of detached particle mass, gives indications about which of the two mechanisms is dominant. Model simulations indicate that erosion makes the biofilm surface smoother. Sloughing, in contrast, leads to an increased biofilm-surface roughness. Faster growing biofilms have a faster detachment rate than slow-growing biofilms, under similar hydrodynamic conditions and biofilm strength. This is in perfect accordance with the experimental evidence showing that detachment is dependent on both shear- and microbial-growth rates. High growth rates trigger instability in biofilm accumulation and abrupt biomass loss (sloughing). Massive sloughing can be avoided by high liquid shear, combined with low biomass growth rates. As the modeling results show, the causes for sloughing must be sought not only in the biofilm strength, but also in its shape. Several</description>
    <dc:title>Two-dimensional model of biofilm detachment caused by internal stress from liquid flow</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Cristian Picioreanu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mark van Loosdrecht</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Joseph Heijnen</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1002/1097-0290(20000120)72:2&#60;205::AID-BIT9&#62;3.0.CO;2-L</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Biotechnology &#38; Bioengineering, Vol. 72, No. 2. (2001), pp. 205-218.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-26T18:13:08-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2001</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Biotechnology &#38; Bioengineering</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>72</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>205</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>218</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>biofilm</prism:category>
    <prism:category>detachment</prism:category>
    <prism:category>flow</prism:category>
    <prism:category>lb</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2599360">
    <title>A three-dimensional computer model analysis of three hypothetical biofilm detachment mechanisms</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/matthewhflamm/article/2599360</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 97, No. 6. (2007), pp. 1573-1584.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Three hypothetical mechanisms of detachment were incorporated into a three-dimensional computer model of biofilm development. The model integrated processes of substrate utilization, substrate diffusion, growth, cell advection, and detachment in a cellular automata framework. The purpose of this investigation was to characterize each of the mechanisms with respect to four criteria: the resulting biofilm structure, the existence of a steady state, the propensity for sloughing events, and the dynamics during starvation. The three detachment mechanisms analyzed represented various physical and biological influences hypothesized to affect biofilm detachment. The first invoked the concept of fluid shear removing biomass that protrudes far above the surface and is therefore subjected to relatively large drag forces. The second pathway linked detachment to changes in the local availability of a nutrient. The third pathway simulated an erosive process in which individual cells are lost from the surface of a biofilm cell cluster. The detachment mechanisms demonstrated diverse behaviors with respect to the four analysis criteria. The height-dependant mechanism produced flat, steady state biofilms that lacked sloughing events. Detachment based on substrate limitation produced significant sloughing events. The resulting biofilm structures included distinct, hollow clusters separated by channels. The erosion mechanism produced neither a non-zero steady state nor sloughing events. A mechanism combining all three-detachment mechanisms produced mushroom-like structures. The dynamics of biofilm decay during starvation were distinct for each detachment mechanism. These results show that detachment is a critical determinant of biofilm structure and of the dynamics of biofilm accumulation and loss. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007; 97: 1573-1584. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description>
    <dc:title>A three-dimensional computer model analysis of three hypothetical biofilm detachment mechanisms</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jason Chambless</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Philip Stewart</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1002/bit.21363</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 97, No. 6. (2007), pp. 1573-1584.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-03-26T18:08:28-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Biotechnology and Bioengineering</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>97</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>6</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>1573</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>1584</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>biofilm</prism:category>
    <prism:category>detachment</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

