<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:31:30 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: klouie Berns</title>
	<description>CiteULike: klouie Berns</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/author/Berns</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/804182"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/615602"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/239537"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/804182">
    <title>Activity in human ventral striatum locked to errors of reward prediction.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/804182</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Nat Neurosci, Vol. 5, No. 2. (February 2002), pp. 97-98.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The mesolimbic dopaminergic system has long been known to be involved in the processing of rewarding stimuli, although recent evidence from animal research has suggested a more specific role of signaling errors in the prediction of rewards. We tested this hypothesis in humans, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and an operant conditioning paradigm for the discrete delivery of small quantities of fruit juice, along with a control experiment in which juice was substituted with a neutral visual stimulus. A local estimation of the activity in the ventral striatum showed a significant differentiation when the juice was withheld at the expected time of delivery; this finding was not replicated in the case of visual stimulation, providing evidence for time-locked processing of reward prediction errors in human ventral striatum.</description>
    <dc:title>Activity in human ventral striatum locked to errors of reward prediction.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>G Pagnoni</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>CF Zink</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>PR Montague</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>GS Berns</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1038/nn802</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Nat Neurosci, Vol. 5, No. 2. (February 2002), pp. 97-98.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-08-17T13:08:44-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Nat Neurosci</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1097-6256</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>97</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>98</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>fmri</prism:category>
    <prism:category>human</prism:category>
    <prism:category>pg</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reward</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ventral_striatum</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/615602">
    <title>Neurobiological Substrates of Dread</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/615602</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Science, Vol. 312, No. 5774. (5 May 2006), pp. 754-758.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Given the choice of waiting for an adverse outcome or getting it over with quickly, many people choose the latter. Theoretical models of decision-making have assumed that this occurs because there is a cost to waiting--i.e., dread. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we measured the neural responses to waiting for a cutaneous electric shock. Some individuals dreaded the outcome so much that, when given a choice, they preferred to receive more voltage rather than wait. Even when no decision was required, these extreme dreaders were distinguishable from those who dreaded mildly by the rate of increase of neural activity in the posterior elements of the cortical pain matrix. This suggests that dread derives, in part, from the attention devoted to the expected physical response and not simply from fear or anxiety. Although these differences were observed during a passive waiting procedure, they correlated with individual behavior in a subsequent choice paradigm, providing evidence for a neurobiological link between the experienced disutility of dread and subsequent decisions about unpleasant outcomes. 10.1126/science.1123721</description>
    <dc:title>Neurobiological Substrates of Dread</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Gregory Berns</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Chappelow</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Milos Cekic</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Caroline Zink</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Giuseppe Pagnoni</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Megan Martin-Skurski</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1126/science.1123721</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Science, Vol. 312, No. 5774. (5 May 2006), pp. 754-758.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2006-05-05T22:58:53-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Science</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:volume>312</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>5774</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>754</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>758</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>aversive</prism:category>
    <prism:category>discounting</prism:category>
    <prism:category>neuroeconomics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>neuroimaging</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/239537">
    <title>Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/klouie/article/239537</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Neuron, Vol. 36, No. 2. (10 October 2002), pp. 265-284.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A recent flurry of neuroimaging and decision-making experiments in humans, when combined with single-unit data from orbitofrontal cortex, suggests major additions to current models of reward processing. We review these data and models and use them to develop a specific computational relationship between the value of a predictor and the future rewards or punishments that it promises. The resulting computational model, the predictor-valuation model (PVM), is shown to anticipate a class of single-unit neural responses in orbitofrontal and striatal neurons. The model also suggests how neural responses in the orbitofrontal-striatal circuit may support the conversion of disparate types of future rewards into a kind of internal currency, that is, a common scale used to compare the valuation of future behavioral acts or stimuli.</description>
    <dc:title>Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>PR Montague</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>GS Berns</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>Neuron, Vol. 36, No. 2. (10 October 2002), pp. 265-284.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-06-28T16:02:12-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2002</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Neuron</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0896-6273</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>36</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>265</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>284</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>neuroeconomics</prism:category>
    <prism:category>orbitofrontal</prism:category>
    <prism:category>review</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reward</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

