<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:20:07 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: jyuh D'Intini</title>
	<description>CiteULike: jyuh D'Intini</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/jyuh/author/D'Intini</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/jyuh/article/205289"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/jyuh/article/2754928"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/jyuh/article/205289">
    <title>Uremic Toxins: A New Focus on an Old Subject</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/jyuh/article/205289</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Seminars in Dialysis, Vol. 18, No. 3. (May 2005), pp. 203-211.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
    <dc:title>Uremic Toxins: A New Focus on an Old Subject</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Asuman Yavuz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ciro Tetta</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Fevzi Ersoy</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Vincent D'Intini</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ranistha Ratanarat</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Massimo De Cal</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Monica Bonello</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Valeria Bordoni</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gabriella Salvatori</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Emilio Andrikos</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Gulsen Yakupoglu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Nathan Levin</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Claudio Ronco</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2005.18313.x</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Seminars in Dialysis, Vol. 18, No. 3. (May 2005), pp. 203-211.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2005-05-19T19:32:00-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2005</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Seminars in Dialysis</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0894-0959</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>18</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>3</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>211</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:publisher>Blackwell Publishing</prism:publisher>
    <prism:category>hd</prism:category>
    <prism:category>ukm</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/jyuh/article/2754928">
    <title>Evaluation and Initial Management of Acute Kidney Injury.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/jyuh/article/2754928</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN (19 March 2008)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The evaluation and initial management of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) should include: (1) an assessment of the contributing causes of the kidney injury, (2) an assessment of the clinical course including comorbidities, (3) a careful assessment of volume status, and (4) the institution of appropriate therapeutic measures designed to reverse or prevent worsening of functional or structural kidney abnormalities. The initial assessment of patients with AKI classically includes the differentiation between prerenal, renal, and postrenal causes. The differentiation between so-called &#34;prerenal&#34; and &#34;renal&#34; causes is more difficult, especially because renal hypoperfusion may coexist with any stage of AKI. Using a modified Delphi approach, the multidisciplinary international working group, generated a set of testable research questions. Key questions included the following: Is there a difference in prognosis between volume-responsive and volume-unresponsive AKI? Are there biomarkers whose patterns (dynamic changes) predict the severity and recovery of AKI (maximal stage of AKI, need for RRT, renal recovery, mortality) and guide therapy? What is the best biomarker to assess prospectively whether AKI is volume responsive? What is the best biomarker to assess the optimal volume status in AKI patients? In evaluating the current literature and ongoing studies, it was thought that the answers to the questions posed herein would improve the understanding of AKI, and ultimately patient outcomes.</description>
    <dc:title>Evaluation and Initial Management of Acute Kidney Injury.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>Jonathan Himmelfarb</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Michael Joannidis</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bruce Molitoris</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Miet Schietz</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Mark D Okusa</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>David Warnock</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Franco Laghi</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Stuart L Goldstein</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Richard Prielipp</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Chirag R Parikh</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Neesh Pannu</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Suzana M Lobo</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sudhir Shah</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Vincent D'Intini</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>John A Kellum</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.2215/CJN.04971107</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN (19 March 2008)</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-05-05T02:49:37-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2008</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>1555-905X</prism:issn>
    <prism:category>arf</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

