<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
   xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"

>
<channel rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/about">
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:08:09 BST</pubDate>


	<title>CiteULike: dep Beran</title>
	<description>CiteULike: dep Beran</description>


	<link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/dep/author/Beran</link>
	<dc:publisher>CiteULike.org</dc:publisher>
	<dc:language>en-gb</dc:language>
	<dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2004-2008 citeulike.org</dc:rights>
	<items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/dep/article/1981581"/>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.citeulike.org/user/dep/article/2188644"/>

	</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
	</channel>


<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/dep/article/1981581">
    <title>Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/dep/article/1981581</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Exp Psychol Gen, Vol. 135, No. 2. (May 2006), pp. 282-297.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although researchers are exploring animals' capacity for monitoring their states of uncertainty, the use of some paradigms allows the criticism that animals map avoidance responses to error-causing stimuli not because of uncertainty monitored but because of feedback signals and stimulus aversion. The authors addressed this criticism with an uncertainty-monitoring task in which participants completed blocks of trials with feedback deferred so that they could not associate reinforcement signals to particular stimuli or stimulus-response pairs. Humans and 1 of 2 monkeys were able to make cognitive, decisional uncertainty responses that were independent of feedback or reinforcement history within a task. This finding unifies the comparative literature on uncertainty monitoring. The dissociation of performance from reinforcement has theoretical implications, and the deferred-feedback technique has many applications.</description>
    <dc:title>Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>JD Smith</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MJ Beran</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>JS Redford</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>DA Washburn</dc:creator>
    <dc:identifier>doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.282</dc:identifier>
    <dc:source>J Exp Psychol Gen, Vol. 135, No. 2. (May 2006), pp. 282-297.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2007-11-25T17:18:54-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2006</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Exp Psychol Gen</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0096-3445</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>135</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>282</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>297</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>human</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>nonhuman</prism:category>
    <prism:category>reinforcement</prism:category>
    <prism:category>uncertainty</prism:category>
</item>



<item rdf:about="http://www.citeulike.org/user/dep/article/2188644">
    <title>Delay of gratification and delay maintenance by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).</title>
    <link>http://www.citeulike.org/user/dep/article/2188644</link>
    <description>&lt;i&gt;J Gen Psychol, Vol. 134, No. 2. (April 2007), pp. 199-216.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The authors tested the self-control of rhesus macaques by assessing if they could refrain from reaching into a food container to maximize the accumulation of sequentially delivered food items (a delay-maintenance task). Three different versions of the task varied the quantity and quality of available food items. In the first 2 versions, food items accumulated across the length of the trial until a monkey consumed the items. In the 3rd task, a single less-preferred food item preceded a single more-preferred food item. Some monkeys delayed gratification even with relatively long delays between deliveries of items. However, the data suggested that self-control, in the majority of tested individuals, was not significantly different across different task versions and that self-control by macaques was not as prevalent in these tasks as it is in chimpanzees and human children.</description>
    <dc:title>Delay of gratification and delay maintenance by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).</dc:title>

    <dc:creator>TA Evans</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>MJ Beran</dc:creator>
    <dc:source>J Gen Psychol, Vol. 134, No. 2. (April 2007), pp. 199-216.</dc:source>
    <dc:date>2008-01-02T16:26:43-00:00</dc:date>
    <prism:publicationYear>2007</prism:publicationYear>
    <prism:publicationName>J Gen Psychol</prism:publicationName>
    <prism:issn>0022-1309</prism:issn>
    <prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
    <prism:number>2</prism:number>
    <prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
    <prism:endingPage>216</prism:endingPage>
    <prism:category>discounting</prism:category>
    <prism:category>macaques</prism:category>
    <prism:category>primate</prism:category>
    <prism:category>temporal</prism:category>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>

